1. The Defendant’s KRW 83,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from January 10, 2018 to July 5, 2019 to the Plaintiff.

1. Name of technical service contract for fact-finding: Contract price for the services to be established for the E-L creation of D Forest in Chungcheong City: KRW 495 million (including value-added tax): Contract period: Article 4 of the contract term from the commencement date to the permission date for development activities, technical affairs necessary for the housing site preparation projects, and consultation thereon, and Gap shall be responsible for all kinds of consent and administrative affairs necessary for the project;

(1) A preliminary investigation (total: 73,298 square meters)

1. Current status survey;

2. Ground survey 2) Urban planning facilities (road: small roads, authorization of implementation plan for access roads, and design;

1. Authorization of an implementation plan for urban planning facilities (road: F. Access Road) and permission for development (stage 1: 6,900 square meters) (stage 6: 3);

1. Preparation of books for permission for development activities and rental thereof;

2. Permission for various exclusive consultations;

3. Civil engineering design;

4. A project to examine factors influencing disasters;

5. Standing timber reduction survey and forest survey report: (a) Article 6 of the Housing Site Development Project (1) (1) of the Housing Site Development Project Act (66,398 square meters after completion of the first-stage development permit) (1) shall be paid in the following phases. The payment of the price shall be made in cash at the time of a non-high-end contract with the value-added tax (30,000,000 33,000,000 33,000,0000 110,000,000,000 110,000,000,000 or less at the time of receipt of the housing site development project at 20,000,000, 200,22,000,22,000,000, 150,000,000 won at the time of approval of the housing site development project (3) shall be paid in the separate settlement contract with the company A, 1,00,05,00,000.

Although “Defendant A” is indicated as “Defendant 4 and others” under the Defendant Service Contract, it is difficult to regard the said four persons as parties to the said Service Contract in light of the fact that the said four persons were not specified, and that there were no circumstances in which they signed and sealed.