The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court determined that it is reasonable to view that the savings bank and C created 14 collateral mortgages with the intent to secure the debt of the instant loan, which is the secured debt, independently and independently, as the secured debt of each of the 14 households including 1 and 2 real estate, not the joint collateral mortgages under Article 368 of the Civil Act, as the accumulated collateral mortgages independently securing the instant loan claims.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above fact-finding and determination by the court below are just and acceptable, and there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the relevant legal principles, such as the principle

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.