The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal is that the defendant was in possession of G, and the defendant was arrested by the investigation agency as to whether he moves philophones kept in the G's office upon the request of G and the wife H.

Considering these circumstances, the sentence of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, confiscation, collection of 250,00 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant's assertion is not reliable as to the reasons why the defendant's assertion was held 62.09g of the judgment philopon, the defendant's assertion is not reliable. However, even if the defendant's assertion is true as stated in the court below, the responsibility is not weak, the 62.09g of the philopon is a quantity that can administer not less than 2,00 times per time, and the one time medication is a considerable amount that can administer not less than 1,200 times even if it is deemed 0.05g of the 0.05g of the 1,200 g, taking into account the circumstances surrounding the possession of the above philopon at the court below, considering the fact that the defendant cooperates in the investigation into a special robbery, the court below's punishment is too excessive beyond the reasonable scope of discretion.

shall not be deemed to exist.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.