1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,693,100 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from May 30, 2014 to November 24, 2015, and the following.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Business name: C Business name - Public notice: July 4, 2012; D- Business operator announced by Gyeonggi-do: Defendant;

B. The ruling of expropriation made on April 14, 2014 by the Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal on expropriation - The land subject to expropriation is the land subject to expropriation, and the obstacles are referred to as “instant obstacles” in the attached Form 661 square meters and the obstacles indicated in the attached Table (hereinafter referred to as “land subject to expropriation”), in the time of the realization owned by the Plaintiff: Total amount of 130,432,000 won (i.e., land 119,310,500 won) - the date of commencement of expropriation: May 29, 2014.

The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on October 23, 2014 - The content of the ruling: The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant land is evaluated as “site” and the compensation for losses is increased; the appraiser does not accept the Plaintiff’s assertion: Korea Standards Appraisal Corporation and the Central Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal”)

D. Results of the appraisal commission to appraiser F of this Court (hereinafter “court appraisal”) - Contents of appraisal: 135,125,100 won totaling compensation for losses: The appraiser selected 2,288 square meters of the land of this case as a standard for comparison of the land of this case in the same way as the appraisal of the land of this case, and assessed the compensation for losses of this case at KRW 124,003,60 based on the appraisal of the land of this case by comparing the point of time revision, regional factors, individual factors, and other factors. On the ground that it is difficult to confirm the current status due to the loss at the time of the onsite investigation, the appraiser assessed the compensation for losses of the obstacles of this case as KRW 11,121,500 based on the appraisal of the judgment.

[Ground of Recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2-1, 3, 4-1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the court's entrustment of appraisal to appraiser F, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion is about the land of this case.