logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.09.11 2017가단13594
임금
Text

1. Defendant B’s amount corresponding to each of the corresponding amounts in the column of claim for the attached sheet to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed Party.

Reasons

1. Claim against Defendant B - Indicating the claim: The amount of corresponding claim in the table in the annexed sheet as the employer of Defendant B. - The full acceptance of the claim between the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed Party - Grounds: Decision by service by publication (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. The Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant C also asserts that Defendant C is jointly and severally liable for the payment of wages to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties as Defendant B’s partner.

However, each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 11 of the plaintiff's submission, as shown above, is inconsistent with the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4 (a written statement that defendant Eul is not a partner of the defendant Eul, a non-prosecution disposition that is not a partner of the defendant Eul's investigation agency's suspicion against defendant C) and the whole oral argument, and each of the above evidence alone is insufficient to recognize defendant C as a partner of the defendant Eul, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and thus, the plaintiff (appointed party)'

3. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim against the defendant B is accepted, and the claim against the defendant C is dismissed.

arrow