All appeals are dismissed.

The Defendants’ grounds of appeal are also examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below determined that the facts charged against Defendant B were guilty on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and rejected Defendant B’s assertion of self-defense is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the law of logic and experience or by misapprehending the legal principles on self-defense.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a fine for each term has been imposed on the Defendants, the allegation that the amount

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.