Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 3, 2016, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of the city bus, was driving the bus around 09:45 on August 3, 2016, and was stopped to allow passengers to board and alight from the front bus stop in front of the apartment block 621-15 as proposed in Gwangju City Council.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent passengers from falling off the bus by safely starting the door after checking passengers' getting on and off the bus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the victim D (the age of 60) (the age of 60) who was boarding as the above sentence due to negligence that started in the opening of the above sentence, to fall into the floor.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from an injury to the victim by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, such as a chest fright, which requires a 12 week medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement traffic accident occurrence report, actual condition investigation report, closure of accident images and photographic diagnosis report

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment; Article 268 of the Criminal Act; Selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

2. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the grounds for sentencing shall be considered as follows: (a) type 1 (the person subject to special mitigation of punishment for traffic accidents) [the person subject to special mitigation] in the mitigated area of punishment (the decision of sentence] the negligence of the defendant and the injury of the victim; (b) the defendant is against the defendant's wrong judgment; (c) the injured person in agreement with the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant; (d) the bus operated by the defendant was covered by the comprehensive automobile insurance; (e) the bus insurance after the accident was covered by the defendant; (e) the bus engineer was placed only after the accident; and (e) the reason for sentencing favorable to the fact that there was