A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 15, 2018, the Defendant: (a) explained that “a request to take an administrative fine against illegal dumping is not properly treated; (b)” filed by him/her in the face room of the Myeon Office located in Macheon-si, Macheon-si, Macheon-si, Mancheon-si; (c) while having explained that “A request to take an administrative fine against illegal dumping is prohibited from taking an administrative fine due to the absence of an illegal speculative person,” the Defendant was subject to a large amount of disturbance.

Defendant continues to change E

At the request of the victim, the victim committed violence, such as flabing and salkeing the flab.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the daily affairs of the Myeon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. A photo of the victim's assault;

1. The 112 Report processing table [the defendant and his defense counsel] asserts that although the defendant had flabbage, this is the defendant's flabing, this is the defendant's flabing first and flabbbbing, and was miscellaneous at a level of legitimate defense against it.

In other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of the judgment of the court below, i.e., a sudden and rush occurrence and partial uncertainty or alteration are made due to incomplete memory, but in substitution, E and F made a statement to the effect that the Defendant first saw sound, and E and F pushed the Defendant into a sofa, and that E and F pushed the Defendant into a sofa, and that E and F was pushed the Defendant, it can be confirmed that the photograph taken immediately after this case’s discovery of additional short of the size of E in E, and the Defendant reported the disturbance to the police at the side of the Myeon office of the case, such as the criminal facts, at the time when the report was made. However, there is no objective material to support the argument of the Defendant and his defense counsel that E used violence (only only with the additional pictures submitted by the Defendant cannot be recognized as assaulting the Defendant first).