1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff can be acknowledged as having remitted KRW 68,00,000 to the defendant's agricultural bank account at the defendant's request on October 25, 2012. However, it is difficult to view that the above facts alone are unjust enrichment of the amount equivalent to the above KRW 68,00,00 from the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

(1) The plaintiff argues that the defendant acquired the above 68 million won with C or aided the above 68 million won or aided the above fraud by C, but there is no evidence to acknowledge the above tort claim. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.