1. The Defendant’s KRW 276,966,644 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from October 6, 2012 to January 25, 2013.

1. According to the purport of Gap evidence No. 1 and all pleadings as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff, on October 13, 201, 201, 3,873,643,909, building price of KRW 114,869,174, value-added tax of KRW 11,486,917, KRW 2.700,000,000, KRW 2,795 square meters (hereinafter "the land in this case") and KRW 324.14 square meters (hereinafter "the building in this case") of Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and KRW 2,706,000,000, KRW 365,000,000,000, KRW 2,7036,000,000,000,000, KRW 2,7036,000,000,000,000.

2. The Defendant’s assertion argues that the sales contract for the instant land and building is “the sale and purchase designated by quantity” as stipulated in Article 574 of the Civil Act, and that, after the conclusion of the sales contract, a part of the area on the registry of the instant land was included in the road as a result of surveying the instant land after the conclusion of the sales contract, the Defendant claimed that the amount corresponding thereto be reduced pursuant to Article 572 of the Civil Act

The land and building of this case are as follows.