logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.14 2017고단633 (1)
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 400,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 2, 2016, the Defendant, at around 06:30 on November 2, 2016, was on a different table among the D cafeterias in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

B(22) and victims E (21) are slick

In other words, the victim's face and body were assaulted by drinking during the dispute of the chemicalization.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the police against E or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (fix CCTVs after cutting down the field CCTV);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In full view of the reasoning, contingent crimes in sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, reflectivity, and other circumstances leading up to the Defendant’s commission of the instant crime, the degree and result of damage, circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, and other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and arguments, the sentence shall be determined as ordered.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A, around November 2, 2016, 06:30, engaged in other tables while drinking and drinking in the D cafeteria located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

B(22) Sphere slick

In other words, fluent assaulted upon B's face and body in drinking during the dispute of chemicalization.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act;

B. The victim expressed his intention not to punish him after the prosecution of this case

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow