Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall engage in the business of converting into money or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, along with C and D, set up 60 game machine for “Yecheon-si E and 1st century” from September 2015 to December 2015, 2015, and from February 2016 to March 2016, and C, as an employer, the Defendant and D, as an employee, managed the overall game site, had many unspecified customers who find the place of the game play a game by inserting cash in the game machine, after converting the amount of 10,000 won per point into a minimum of 10 won per unit, and deducting 10% of the following fee.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with C and D, exchanged gift, which is a result of the use of game water, was conducted as a business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to C, D, G, H, I, and J;

1. Each internal investigation report (related to the F Game heads), internal investigation report (related to the dispatch of photographs), internal investigation report (related to the refund of a F Game Stackter), records of seizure, list of seizure, list of seizure of the game site, cash of the list of seizure of the game site, arrest report of the case, investigation report (related to seized articles), investigation report (related to attachment of photographs at the time of execution of a warrant of seizure), investigation report (related to attachment of photographs at the time of execution of a warrant of seizure), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 44 of the relevant Act on criminal facts, Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of the Alternative Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. H, I, and J. Ha who did not prosecute, even though the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was the confession and reflect of the defendant, the degree of participation in the crime as an employee is relatively insignificant, and the degree of participation in the crime was similar to that of the employee.