logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.26 2016가단76023
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Based on the Busan District Court Decision 2005Gaso190833, the Plaintiff’s cause of the Plaintiff’s claim was based on the judgment of the Busan District Court 2005Gaso19083, B received a seizure and collection order (Dasan District Court 2016 Taso2807) as to the claim against the Defendants, and on February 18, 2016, the seizure and collection order was served on the Defendants.

The Defendants seek payment of the Defendants’ insurance money and other claims against the Defendants.

2. The judgment B concluded an insurance contract with the Defendants

or there is no evidence to prove the existence of claims, such as insurance proceeds.

Rather, if Eul added the purport of Eul's evidence 1-1 to 3 and Eul's evidence 1-2 to the whole purport of the pleading, Eul can only recognize the fact that Eul entered into a contract with Eul with the defendant Niven Insurance Co., Ltd., and that it is the insured of 'B's 'B's 'B' 'B' 'B' 'B' 'B' 'B' 'B' 'B' 'B' 'B' 'B' 2006 'B'

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow