logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2015.11.17 2015나5702
위자료
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. B, in order to perform snow removal work on February 21, 2014, the Plaintiff-owned CEX vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned vehicles”) EXE vehicles, which were snowed in snow while snowing in a string season, was destroyed.

B. The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to the digging machines operated by the above B.

C. On March 8, 2014, Dongyang-gu Co., Ltd. lent DK 5 vehicles (hereinafter “instant siren”) to the Plaintiff according to the automobile insurance contract between the Defendant and B.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 3, evidence Nos. 10-1 through 3, evidence Nos. 2, evidence Nos. 4-1 through 6, evidence Nos. 5-1 and 5-1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. On March 20, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that he was treated as the larceny of the instant siren by the president of the Dongyang-gu Co., Ltd.

The president of the said siren gave less than 10 days the Defendant the rental fee, and changed the car of the relevant party while threateninging the Plaintiff to speak, take a bath, and sensium, and threaten the Plaintiff, and forced the Plaintiff to take the Plaintiff’s her her her her her her her her her her herths in the instant siren.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff transferred the instant siren to the president of the said rentalcar, and forced labor to move the Plaintiff’s her her her her her her her at the Plaintiff’s house to the Plaintiff’s house, and her her her her her her her her her her her her and

However, the Defendant: (a) returned the instant siren to the Plaintiff; (b) stated that, on the 13th day from the date of lending the instant siren, the Defendant could not make a siren out of 10 days under the Hague Automobile Insurance Contract.

The Plaintiff was unable to contact the Defendant to scrap the Plaintiff’s vehicle for 10 days from the lending of the instant siren, and was believed to be able to use the instant siren until the completion of repair, and was subject to defamation and physical labor by the said siren president.

Therefore, it is true.

arrow