beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. On March 28, 2017, Plaintiff B purchased a building of 484.8 square meters and its ground from the former president of J (hereinafter “former President of J”) for KRW 6.75 billion, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 20, 2017 with respect to each of the above real estate.
(F) The Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant C”) published an article of the title “K” (hereinafter referred to as “instant article”) on April 21, 2017, as shown in [Attachment 1], on the one page of the newspaper he issued on April 21, 2017.
Defendant D is a reporter belonging to Defendant C who prepared the instant first engineer.
The main contents of the first engineer of this case are as follows.
Defendant E (hereinafter “Defendant E”) on April 26, 2017, on the Internet news site (L) operated by himself/herself, as shown in attached Tables 2 and 3, the article of “M” (hereinafter “instant article 2”) was “business-ro”.
Defendant F is a reporter of Defendant E who prepared the instant article 2.
The article 2 of this case related to the plaintiff Eul's gift list related to the purchase of the plaintiff Eul's I Doz before J was largely divided into the part related to the purchase of the plaintiff Eul's I Doz and the part related to the plaintiff Eul's gift list which was found in the past. The main contents are as follows.
Defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant G”) operated on May 4, 2017 on its Internet news site (N) and as shown in attached Table 3, the article of “O” (hereinafter “instant third news article”) was “business-ro”.
Defendant H is a reporter belonging to Defendant G who prepared the instant third engineer.
The main contents of the third engineer of this case are as follows.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1 (including all of the paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. Plaintiffs 1-B’s purchase process and the Defendants’ common falsity.