beta
Text
1. Defendant C: ① 25,00,000 won for Plaintiff A; ② 9,00,000 won for Plaintiff B and each of the said money.
Reasons
1. As to Plaintiff A’s claim against Defendant C
A. In fact 1) On March 16, 2014, Plaintiff A leased from Defendant C the entire area of the 49.92 square meters of a multi-family housing unit E’s land year in Seodaemun-gu Seoul and multi-family household, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and the deposit amount of KRW 50,00,000, and the lease period of KRW 24 months from May 9, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “the lease of this case”).
2) The Plaintiff A received a refund of KRW 25,00,000,000, which is part of the deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000 from Defendant C, and did not receive the remainder of KRW 25,00,000.
[Grounds for Recognition] The entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. In light of the facts acknowledged above, it is reasonable to view the termination of the lease of Article 1 of this case. Accordingly, Defendant C is obligated to pay to Plaintiff A the remainder lease deposit of the lease of Article 1 of this case and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from September 6, 2017 to the date of full payment, as claimed by the said Plaintiff, following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case.
2. As to the plaintiff B's claim against the defendant C
A. In fact 1) On April 17, 2012, Plaintiff B leased from Defendant C the entire area of the 49.92 square meters of a multi-family housing unit E’s land year in Seodaemun-gu Seoul and multi-family household, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and the deposit amount of KRW 65,00,000, and the lease period of KRW 24 months from May 30, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the “second lease”).
(2) Plaintiff B received 56,00,000 won, which was part of the deposit 65,000,000 won from Defendant C, and did not recover the remainder of KRW 9,00,000.
[Grounds for Recognition] The entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. In light of the facts acknowledged above, it is reasonable to view that the lease of the second lease of this case was terminated, and therefore, Defendant C is not more than KRW 9,000,000 for the remaining lease of the second lease of this case to Plaintiff B.