The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (one million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime and is against the law

The sentencing of the lower court appears to be within the reasonable scope of discretion, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the lower court, and the sentencing of the lower court cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering the following: (a) there are circumstances that consider the sentencing of a beneficiary of livelihood conditional benefit, who is a beneficiary of a livelihood benefit, and who has a 5-class visual and delayed disability; (b) considering that the nature of the crime is bad in light of the form of the crime; and (c) the Defendant has a history of criminal punishment several times due to business interference, violent crimes, etc.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.