beta
Text
1. Defendant A’s interest rate for KRW 77,263,397 and KRW 52,90,892 among the Plaintiff shall be from October 6, 2015 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Claim against the defendant A;
A. On May 29, 2003, the Industrial Bank of Korea established the claim against Defendant A of the Industrial Bank of Korea for the payment of KRW 643,00,00,00 (the principal amount of KRW 529,008,921 as of December 10, 2014; KRW 243,625,052 as of the principal amount; KRW 772,63,973 as of December 10, 201; hereinafter “the loan in this case”); all rights related thereto (including rights to mortgage and guarantor); the Industrial Bank of Korea established the Industrial Bank of Korea as a limited-liability company of the United Nations Asset Management; the above company once it is another company for the United Nations Asset Management; the above company was finally transferred to the Future Savings Bank in accordance with the Asset Transfer Order; however, the Plaintiff was declared bankrupt on October 10, 2013 as part of the principal amount of the loan in this case; the Plaintiff’s future interest in arrears was served on KRW 375,3636,2975,297.37.36
(b) Judgment made by deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);
2. Claim against the defendant B
A. (1) As the Plaintiff’s assertion (1) joint and several sureties’s debt of the instant loan by Defendant A, the said Defendant B is jointly and severally with Defendant A.
have an obligation to pay the money stated in the subsection.
(2) At the time of Defendant B’s work at a printing company around 2003, upon request from Defendant A, the representative of the company, and upon issuance of a guarantee certificate from the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund for 80% of the loan, Defendant B guaranteed the 80% of the loan, and affixed seal at the time of borrowing the remainder of the loan from one bank for 20%, and there is no other good guarantee.
Even if the obligation of the instant loan was guaranteed, there was a fact that the loan guaranteed.
The five-year extinctive prescription has expired.
B. We examine the judgment, below: