Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven B Poter truck under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.171% at a distance of about 200 meters from the road in front of a mutual influence cafeteria located in the south Eup/Myeon, a city of inn at around 17:00 to the road front of the same rithm terminal; (b) the Defendant driven B Poter truck under the influence of alcohol content of blood.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving freight cars B.

The defendant 1. The defendant 1. He driven the road of about 20 km from the side of the Pacific Agricultural Cooperative to the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth by the parallel of the road in front of the Taepon terminal located in the Taepyeong-ri, South Eup/Myeon in the city of Sin-ri.

At the time, the taxi platform that is located on the right side of the above road was driven by the victim C(64) while stopping, and thus, in such a case, the driver engaged in driving service had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front side and the left side and the steering wheel, and thereby preventing accidents. However, the defendant was negligent in neglecting it as described in the above 1.1., by negligence, and thereby, received the front part of the left side of the above taxi as the front part of the above cargo.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the above victim to suffer injury, such as salt, tensions, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2(2)2 and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the time limit for the defendant and reflects his opinion.