beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 7.3 million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
around 01:00 on August 10, 201, the Defendant stolen 250,000 won from the cash withdrawal machine within the convenience store managed by the victim's name in the convenience store that he/she works as a customer at the convenience store B, which was located in the convenience store B, by taking away the cke card on the part of the victim D (27 years of age, south) and withdrawing 250,000 won from the cash withdrawal machine within the convenience store managed by the victim.
The defendant is an employee of E, an entertainment drinking house, and F is the president of the above E, while the defendant is an entertainment drinking house.
1. The Defendant: (a) sold the F and Napopopopopopos (Ch. 8,000 won) to customers under the influence of alcohol, who had been able to put the two weeks that were made by inserting the F and Napospospos (C. 8,00 won) into the Balpos 12-year Salpos (hereinafter “Calpos”), and conspired them with the profits of KRW 200,000 per single disease as if they were the two-years.
At around 01:10 on July 15, 201, the Defendant provided the victim H, who had been a customer, with the first two-year two-year two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way two-party two-way two-way two-way two-way two-way
Accordingly, the defendant was delivered KRW 400,000 by deceiving the victim in collusion with F.
2. The Defendant, in violation of the Food Sanitation Act, attempted to attract customers as E- stores, he/she would receive KRW 40,00 per 1 disease per two weeks from F, and conspired with F to attract guests.
At around 03:00 on August 26, 201, the Defendant access to the road near the above Ejuk store to I and 1.1.40,000 Won per two weeks.
'Written proposal', I drawn I to the above E-State as a guest.
Accordingly, the Defendant committed a violation of the rules of business operators in collusion with F.
Summary of Evidence
"2012 Highly 2952"
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. Investigative reports (general), "2012 High Court Decision 2953";
1. Defendant, J, and F.