All appeals by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) are dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant).

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the case, is as follows, except for the submission or addition of the evidence as set forth in the following 2. Thus, the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance (the fact-finding and the judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable even if the plaintiff presented the additional evidence in this court), and the same is

2. From No. 3 to No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “J (hereinafter only referred to as “J”) is a company in charge of the construction of the first floor of the instant factory.” The network operator contracted the construction of the first floor of the instant factory to J (hereinafter referred to as “J”) on February 13, 2015, and applied to “J”.

On the fourth side of the judgment of the court of first instance, "Evidence 13 of A" shall be added to "Evidence 1 through 7 of A" of the first instance judgment, and "each testimony of L and M" of the same conduct shall be taken into consideration "each testimony of witnesses M and E" of the first instance court M, the first instance court and the first instance court witness L.

(6) Section 7 of the judgment of the first instance, and 7 shall be raised as follows:

(j) There is no clear ground to deem that there was a design drawing for the construction of the instant factory at the time of the instant real estate sales contract, but [the instant real estate sales contract includes the drawings attached thereto, but the Plaintiffs and the Defendant are not able to submit clear data thereon. The design drawing (Evidence No. 14) submitted by the Defendant at the time of the construction of the instant real estate sales contract is indicated in March 2015, and it is difficult to recognize that the design drawing was attached thereto at the time of the conclusion of the instant real estate sales contract because the design drawing was stated in the sales contract as of March 2015]. Thus, it should be deemed that the two-story construction of the instant factory was planned to determine the specific contents of the instant real estate sales contract in accordance with the design drawing subsequently prepared.