1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 6, 1979, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service at the National Armed Forces Water Service Hospital on October 31, 2010, by serving as the Second Lieutenant in the Army.

B. On November 1, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant to have rendered distinguished services to the State.

C. On January 28, 2011, the Defendant rendered a non-competent decision on the requirements of a person of distinguished service to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that there cannot be a proximate causal relation between the superior branch of application and official duties in light of the following contents.

On January 7, 2010, the following records are confirmed under the diagnosis of 4-5-6 (L4-5-6) and 6-7 (H4-5) light view that the light signboard escape certificate was conducted on the basis of the diagnosis of 2.0 light signboard escape certificate on January 7, 2010, and that the examination of 10 light-defensive signboards escape certificate (L4-5) was conducted on January 12, 2010, and the examination of 10 light-defensive signboards and ISO conducted on the basis of 10 light-defensives and ISD, but it cannot be confirmed that there was no medical record immediately after it was conducted on the ground that 10 light of the objective records of 10 light-defensives and 2.0 light-defensives of 3 light of the fact that the light-defensing escape certificate was conducted on October 17, 2009.