logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.11.17 2016구합82782
사설항로표지 국가 관리 거부처분취소청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuit is dismissed by the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries.

2. The plaintiff's defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff, a corporation, which is established pursuant to the Korea Gas Corporation Act and engages in the development, export, and import, etc. of natural gas, is LNG’s liquefied natural gas (hereinafter referred to as “LNG”) in the Socong-gu, Socong-gu, Suwon-gu.

(2) On March 24, 2010, the Governor of Gangwon-do filed an application for approval with the Governor of Gangwon-do to build a production base and construct port facilities. The Governor of Gangwon-do approved the development plan for the general industrial complex in Hosan on March 18, 2010. The Plaintiff completed the construction plan for the general industrial complex in Hosan on May 31, 2015, and the Governor of Gangwon-do approved the completion of the construction project on July 21, 2015. (2) On June 24, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application with the head of the East Sea and Port Office for permission for the installation of two signs for construction works, which are private navigational aids, based on Article 5(4) of the Navigational Aids Act.

(Documents Number: 3. The head of the Maritime Affairs and Port Office in the East Sea-1073. On July 9, 2010, the head of the Maritime Affairs and Port Office permitted the installation of a second schedule for the above construction works, and the Plaintiff completed the second schedule for the above construction works.

On May 2, 2013 and June 16, 2014, the Plaintiff reported the closure of 2 schedule of construction work, respectively, on the ground that the relevant construction work has been completed to the head of the East Sea and Port Office, and removed 2 schedule of construction work, respectively, on May 31, 2013 and July 13, 2014.

3) On March 4, 2014, the Plaintiff applied to the head of the East Sea Port Office for the installation permission of two unmanned light vehicles and one radar non-mixeds on the basis of Article 5(4) of the Navigational Aids Act; on April 3, 2014, the Plaintiff applied to the head of the East Sea Port Office for the installation permission of two unmanned light vehicles and one radars; on April 3, 2014, the string part of the string part; the string part of the string part; the string part; and the string part of the string part of the string part; and on the other hand, the head of the East Sea and Port Office permitted the installation of each navigational aid at around that time; and thereafter the Plaintiff completed each navigational aid after the completion of each navigational aid (hereinafter referred to as each of the above navigational aids, the string part of the 2nd

arrow