The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.

1. 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2011. 11. 28. 10:27경 수원시 장안구 C에 있는 D공인중개사 내에서 다음 E 에 접속하여, 그 곳의 익명 게시판에 게재된 '7. 밥그릇 2-1'이라는 게시글의 댓글란에, "F사장님 어제 쉬시더니 이런 엄청난 계산 문제로 저도 빨리 제 앞단지 계산 좀 해봐야 되겠네요 하여간 어디나 미꾸라지 몇 마리가 물을 흐리죠. 오늘 점심은 추어탕 튀김 만두로 하심이 모든 메뉴를 미꾸라지로 ㅎㅎㅎ G가네 추어탕이 대박이라는데 " 라는 댓글을 작성한 것을 비롯하여, 별지 범죄일람표와 같이 도합 26회에 걸쳐 고소인 G의 이름 첫 글자를 따서 삼행시를 짓는 방법으로 고소인을 모욕하였다

2. The offense of insult as referred to in the crime of insult is an expression of an abstract judgment or a sacrific sentiment that could undermine a person’s social evaluation without mentioning the facts (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2003Do3972, Nov. 28, 2003). The other party to insult should be able to presume the identity of the victim based on all the circumstances, such as the expression at least, even if it is not specified in the statement.

However, the whole contents of writing written by the defendant on the real estate Internet page are merely the acts of business collusion due to the real estate-friendly circuits which are now becoming a social issue, and in particular, the social accusation comments against the act of collusion by the real estate agents within H district, and it does not seem to have insulting G.

Even though there is no room to see that G will take the name of “G” in order to arbitrarily comply with “G”, this is merely a part of the phrase that G would have been formed in order to fit it, and when examining the original text of the writing written by the Defendant, the front letter of “G” shall be removed separately.