logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.01.15 2014고단2
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is an employer who is the actual representative of C in Kimhae-si, and runs a painting business using eight regular workers.

From November 7, 2012 to April 29, 2013, the Defendant is employed as an employee produced in the same workplace.

A retired Korean Foreign Workers D (Korean Name E) did not pay KRW 2,378,070 in aggregate of wages on March 3, 2013 and April 4, 2013, within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement between the parties on extension of the due date.

2. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than a judgment (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act) dismissing a defendant's withdrawal of a complaint against a worker who has committed a crime of non-compliance with a decision of dismissal;

arrow