beta
Text
[Defendant A] Suspension of sentence for the defendant
[Defendant B] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant B, from around August 2013, who had worked in F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) operated by E located in E in E in E (hereinafter “F”), was willing to conceal employment facts and receive unemployment benefits from the Victim Employment Ministry of Labor even though he did not actually retired from F and did not receive unemployment benefits.
According to the above public offering, the Defendant, upon being urged to resign from F even though he/she actually worked in the Ministry of Labor on June 24, 2015, applied for unemployment benefits by issuing various documents from E as if he/she was in a de facto condition. The Defendant received total of KRW 3,736,340 on four occasions from the damaged to October 1, 2015, and applied for unemployment benefits by the same method and applied for unemployment benefits from March 28, 2017 to the damaged person on six occasions from around that time to September 4, 2017, and was paid KRW 6,801,240 as unemployment benefits.
As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with E, received goods (a total of KRW 10,537,580) by deceiving the victim, and received unemployment benefits by unlawful means.
2. Defendant A, who had worked in Gyeyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “G”), from August 9, 2015, had been working in Goyang-gu (hereinafter “G”), and was not eligible to receive unemployment benefits by continuing to work without retirement from G, but was not eligible to receive unemployment benefits. However, Defendant A concealed employment facts and received unemployment benefits from the Ministry of Labor for the employment of victims.
On August 25, 2015, the Defendant applied for unemployment benefits as if he were retired from office after having actually continued to work in G in the Employment and Labor Ministry of Labor, and was paid 80,350 won in total from the injured party as unemployment benefits.
Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victim and received the unemployment benefits by illegal means.