logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.07.14 2016고정175
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 1, 201, at the mobile phone store operated by the victim D, “C” in the name of “C” as of March 1, 2011, the Defendant prepared a document as if he/she purchased two cell phoness from the victim, and the fact was not intended to open the cell phone from the victim, and therefore, even if he/she borrowed money from the victim, he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the money from the victim, the Defendant prepared the document as if he/she purchased two cell phoness from the victim and then found the cell phone.

In order to transfer money to his or her husband and wife rapidly, 150,000 won is insufficient, so that he or she can transfer money to his or her wife instead of his or her money to recover Handphones in the face of the week.

‘Falsely speaking', it received 150,000 won from the injured party to the bank deposit account in the name of the accused on the same day and acquired it by money.

2. The Defendant, at around 15:00 on September 23, 201, borrowed money from the victim F of the Victim F in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, such as paragraph 1, at the Handphone store, even though he/she did not have the intent or ability to repay the money, as provided in paragraph 1, as the Defendant would allow the victim to purchase the Handphone, and would have borrowed 60,000 won because he/she had no card or other means. The Defendant would pay back the money.

The phrase “ makes a false statement,” which received 60,000 won in cash from the injured party and acquired it by fraud.

3. On March 24, 2012, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim H (a) operated by the victim H (a 102) of the G building 13:00 on March 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) did not intend to repay the money from the victim; (b) did not intend to make a new application for the purchase of a mobile phone to the victim; and (c) did so by making a new application for the purchase of a mobile phone to the victim; and (d) paid off only KRW 40,00 to the victim

The phrase “ makes a false statement,” which received 40,000 won in cash from the injured party and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of each police statement law to D, F, and H 1.

arrow