logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.04.11 2013고단5159
범인도피
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On July 8, 2013, around 04:43, Defendant A driving a car at a op range in the op range in the corner of the Sing-Eup of the wife population, and Defendant B received the parts of D’s ES525 vehicle driving on the front of the convenience store prior to the op range of convenience points, which had been proceeding on the right side of B’s vehicle due to the negligence of changing the vehicle line, and was proceeding on the right side of B’s vehicle due to the negligence.

Although the Defendant knew of the fact that the Defendant committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment as above, at around 05:03, the Defendant made a false statement to the said police box G during the investigation of the instant case as if the Defendant had caused a traffic accident, thereby allowing the Defendant to escape from the criminal.

2. At around 04:43 on July 8, 2013, Defendant B accepted the phrase “as a result, she was able to have sM525, she only driven by her, and instead, she was able to have she driven by her,” and accepted the phrase “as a result, she was she was shed and driven by her,” on the road front of the convenience store in the opport of the opport of the opport of the opport of the opport of the op

After that, the Defendant moved from a driver’s seat to a chieflight, and the Defendant again moved from the back of the steering seat to the back of the steering seat, and was found to have been seated at A from the beginning. A made a false statement to a slope G, who, around that time, arrived at the convenience store in front of the above opport, stated that “A ST525 car was driven” to the slope G of the F box affiliated with the F box, which arrived at the convenience store in front of the above opport, “A ST525 car was driven.” On the same day, at around 05:03 on the same day, the Defendant responded to the demand for alcohol measurement by re-statementing the same purport.

Accordingly, the Defendant aided and aided A in committing an act of aiding and abetting a criminal like the above Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement made to D, H, I, and J;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. The circumstantial report of an employee;

arrow