1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) KRW 7,739,562 and 6% per annum from September 21, 2016 to March 21, 2017; and

1. The basic facts and the Plaintiff’s assertion as stated in the annexed Form “the cause of claim”

''

2. If the judgment on the cause of the claim is based, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid price for the goods supplied by the ice Cream and the damages for delay prescribed in the Commercial Act and the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, and to return the coolants listed in the attached Table.

3. The defendant's assertion and judgment

A. The defendant's assertion that the defendant had suspended the plaintiff's supply of ice cream, supplied ice cream with a scream from other supply stations, suspended scream operations, and paid all the fees for freezing in the absence of the plaintiff's suspension of supply. Thus, the plaintiff is claiming to the purport that the plaintiff is liable for damages suffered by the defendant, refused to deliver cream, and that the plaintiff is liable to pay consolation money to the defendant.

B. There is no evidence to acknowledge that there was a ice forest supply contract concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant that the suspension of the ice forest supply is prohibited and that the ice forest supply should take place based on the fixed supply price for a fixed period of time.

In addition, there is no proof of property damage alleged to be suffered by the defendant.

In the case of a cooling house, the reason alleged by the defendant cannot be the justifiable reason for refusing the delivery.

In the end, all the defendant's arguments are without merit or lack of evidence, and they cannot be accepted.

4. All of the plaintiff's claims are justified.