logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.10.16 2013고합4
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case [criminal records] Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the District Court on March 15, 201 and two years of suspension of execution for fraud was finalized on March 23, 2011.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant, while running a livestock farming business in a stock farm located in Yangju-si (hereinafter referred to as “Yju-si”), was trying to create a stock farm (hereinafter referred to as “stock farm”) on the size of 84,489 square meters, such as Kuwon-gun, Kuwon-gun, etc., the Defendant carried out the construction of the stock farm located in the said stock farm located in Yangju-si, with the purport that “When the stock farm is expropriated in Yangju-si, the Defendant would pay the compensation amount as the compensation amount.”

However, at the time, Yangju-si had already established the right to collateral security amounting to 3.8 billion won in Yangju-si, and thereafter, the compensation amounting to 4.47 billion won in the actual house building company was paid from the actual house building company. However, even if 3.8 billion won in the repayment to the said NAF, the construction company did not have any intent or ability to pay the construction cost.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim (owner) D, who is a supplier of ready-mixeds, to the effect that “The stock farm will be admitted in Gyeyang-si, the compensation amount of which is equivalent to 70 to 8 billion won, and the additional construction cost will be paid after borrowing the stock farm in security.”

On May 14, 2008, the Defendant had the said victim be provided with ready-mixeds equivalent to KRW 747,644,304 from May 14, 2008 to around 2009, and did not pay the price, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the said amount.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that they were supplied with ready-mixed from D, but the amount of the ready-mixed supplied from D is not more than 400 million won, and the defendant paid compensation for accommodation at the time of the contract with D at the time of the supply of ready-mixed with D.

arrow