The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant does not file a civil petition for the purpose of any private interest of the defendant, but only reported it to the viewing to correct the illegal act of the victim and issued an order for restoration to the original state.

The defendant, as part of the victim, made a statement that defames the defendant by destroying the defendant's reputation on the place where the defendant was located together with a third party, and continued to stop the time and slander despite the defendant's warning, and has protected the legal interests of the defendant by the minimal physical force of the victim's flaps. Therefore, the defendant's act is not unlawful.

However, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. In the lower court’s judgment, the Defendant alleged that the Defendant’s act constituted a justifiable act, as ① although the Defendant had frightened the victim’s breath, there was no trace of fat, and ② the Defendant’s act was not unlawful, since the victim continued to fat the city expenses and damaged the reputation

With respect to this, the court below directly examined B (victim) and E, and after the victim of the previous case, the victim of the previous case was the victim of the previous case in the investigative agency and the court of the court of the court below that "I am the president or the victim of the previous case."

v. Jinus v. Jinus v.

The phrase “the Defendant,” stating to the effect that “the Defendant was booming the breath of the victim’s breath, was satching, and the Defendant reported to the police by satching the breath of the bat,” and that “the Defendant was satching the victim’s bat, taken pictures of the victim’s bat at the time, and taken the victim’s bat as a photograph” in the investigative agency and the court of the court below, thereby complying with the victim’s statement and substitution, and the victim’s batis on the day of the instant case.