A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

Around September 8, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around September 8, 2017, the Defendant would play money in the city and pay money to the victim at D stores operated by the victim C, which are located in Ssung-si B, with the need to pay money. On the loan of money, only one month shall be used for one month and the interest shall be repaid without the molding with 10% of the interest.”

However, the defendant did not have any particular property at the time and did not have any special property, and even if the personal debt borrowed from the Gyeonggi Credit Guarantee Foundation, E, etc. including the debt, etc. is over 300 million won and borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, on September 8, 2017, the Defendant received KRW 9 million from the victim to the account of community credit cooperatives in the name of the Defendant, from that time to September 19, 2017, from that time, from that time, the Defendant was transferred to the account of community credit cooperatives in the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 15 million through four times in total as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table 1.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

around 14:30 on April 31, 2018, the Defendant stated that “G sales store” located in F in the Gyeonggi Ethical ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic e.

However, in fact, the Defendant borrowed KRW 15 million from I, 2017, but failed to repay the debt, etc., and at the time, he was demanded to the other creditors to repay the debt. The Defendant did not use the borrowed amount received from the victim to prevent the customer card as above, but did not intend to use the borrowed amount to repay the debt to other creditors, so there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed amount even if it was received from the victim.

In other words, the Defendant, from August 31, 2018, received KRW 5 million in cash from the victim on the pretext of borrowing money from the victim, from that time to August 14:00.