logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.01.10 2019고단2438
업무방해등
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The facts charged in this case

A. The Defendant is a person who resides in the vicinity of the new site of the construction of a house in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, Seoul. The victim company filed several civil petitions with the Yongsan-gu Office, etc. from the time when the construction of the base was commenced, as well as the Seoul Western District Court 2018Gahap33046.

On the other hand, around July 11, 2018, the Defendant demanded the victim company to compensate for the damages that have already been damaged and the future damages predicted, but the victim company rejected the Defendant’s demand on August 24, 2018, and thereafter, the victim company decided to stop the Defendant’s vehicle as stated in “the content of the crime 2.” without parking the Defendant’s vehicle at the Defendant’s house parking lot at the new construction site and stop the vehicle at the entry road at the new construction site, thereby preventing the victim company from smoothly entering the construction site.

B. On August 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) parked the Defendant’s vehicle at the vicinity of the new construction site of the victim company at Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, at the center of the road; (b) around the same day ( August 25, 2018), around 07:59, the Defendant stopped the Defendant’s vehicle at the front corner of the construction site in order to ensure the passage of the construction vehicle by blocking the Defendant’s interference in advance at around 07:59; (c) left the vehicle at the construction site immediately front of the construction site; and (d) continued parking for five hours from around that time; and (d) prevented the Defendant from entering the victim’s vehicle without having access to the other vehicle. Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s new construction work of the victim company and obstructed traffic by allowing it to pass through the land. (d) On September 16, 2018, the Defendant interfered with traffic on the road at the front of the construction site.

arrow