logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.04.09 2020고단1769
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

One day when the Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 30, 2017, the Defendants entered into a contract to purchase the Yeonsu-gu Incheon apartment E heading KRW 3.3 billion, but the amount of KRW 250 million was insufficient, and the Defendants of the financial institution borrowed KRW 190 million from H association on May 8, 2017 and repaid C’s loans to the I Bank, and cancelled the registration of collateral security by the I Bank established on the said apartment.

In light of the above, the Defendants considered to prepare the above money with the lease deposit under the FF Lending G, the ownership of the Defendants, was unable to prepare the purchase price by means of selling the NF Lending due to the registration of the right to collateral security by the NFD, and it was possible for the Defendants to prepare the above payment without cancelling the registration of the right to collateral security, which was received from the lessee.

B and B secured the BJ as a leased object.

around April 6, 2017, the Defendants entered into a lease agreement with the victim M and the Ba as the L Licensed Real Estate Agent Office of Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, with respect to the L Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, with a lease deposit of KRW 70 million, the Defendants, who believed that the Defendant would simultaneously cancel the registration of N bank collateral security in the above loan amount of KRW 72,00,000,000,000,000,000,000 from the victim who believed the end to be the Defendant’s O bank account in Defendant B on the same day, and received the payment of KRW 14,00,000 from Defendant A’s account in May 8, 2017, and KRW 49,000,000,000 from Defendant B’s O bank account.

However, the Defendants acquired the ownership of the above apartment to use the lease deposit in the payment of the remainder of the above apartment, and would be subject to forfeiture of the down payment of the above apartment, and even if there was no other method of preparing money, there was no intention or ability to cancel the above mortgage registration at the same time, the victims of opposing power under the Housing Lease Protection Act with regard to the lease deposit by cancelling the above mortgage registration.

arrow