logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.11.18 2016고단2294
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2016 Height2294】

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B in salary-spon loan.

On May 15, 2014, around 21:00, the Defendant continued to turn to the left the right at the right angle of the Han-gu one day from the direction of the Yak-gu Seoul Metropolitan City at the speed of about 30-40km in the direction of the Yak-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

At the time, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and to prevent accidents by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting to do so, found the victim D (the age of 49) who was sitting on the road due to the negligence in the front of the front side, immediately thereafter, and took a sudden action to avoid the collision, but did not avoid it, but received the victim's right side part with the front wheel part of the left side of the above vehicle.

Ultimately, even if the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the side scarf, the side scarf, etc. outside of the right section, which requires treatment for about six weeks due to such occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stopped, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim and identifying his identity.

2. The Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, caused a traffic accident, and, on the ground that the Defendant was suspended from indictment for a separate fraud, allowed the Defendant to call to E, who is the owner of the above sealed wing vehicle, at the same time and place, to enter the scene of the said accident, on the ground that the Defendant’s indictment was suspended for a separate fraud, and let E escape from the scene by requesting “the statement that he caused a traffic accident instead,” and allowing E to escape from the scene, and cause E to make a false statement as if he had caused a traffic accident at around 22:00 on the same day.

arrow