The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The injury suffered by the victim of the crime of bodily injury resulting from robbery is merely a non-conscept of the number of medical treatment days and a part of the floor of the hand, and it does not constitute the injury in the crime of robbery.

Judgment

The injury of robbery and injury refers to a change in the state of the body and health of the victim and the occurrence of a disability to his/her life function. Thus, in order to be not the above "injury", there was no need for treatment due to extremely minor wife suffering from the victim, and there was no difficulty in daily life even without treatment, or there was a change in the state of the victim's physical health to the extent naturally cured following the passage of the time, as the body condition of the victim can be naturally cured.

shall be applicable where it is impracticable to deem that a failure has occurred in the function of life or the function of life.

(2) On March 8, 2014, the Defendant deemed the victim to have been engaged in fishing with Handbags cited by the victim at around 22:53, the following circumstances revealed by the lower court and the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2003Do2313, Jul. 11, 2003). The Defendant: (a) the victim was able to take Handbags used by the victim; (b) the victim was able to take bags without cutting down the handbags; (c) the victim was towed by 2:3 meters after her kbags and her handbags and her handbags; and (d) the victim was able to take first aid from the 119th immediately after the instant case; and (d) the victim was able to take the treatment of the victim’s handbags and her hand, and (d) the victim’s body 3rd of the body 103rd.