1. As to the land listed in the separate sheet:

A. Defendant C, D, and E are to Defendant B with respect to each of their shares of 1/3 on November 10, 1989.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as indicated in the evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Defendant B purchased from the deceased F on Nov. 10, 1989 the land indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”). The instant land was divided into the said G land on Nov. 13, 1989; the deceased on Apr. 10, 1997, and the deceased’s heir died on Oct. 11, 1999; the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 15, 2007; and Defendant C, D, and E, the spouse of the deceased H, but the deceased on Oct. 11, 200; the Plaintiff purchased the instant G land from Defendant B on behalf of the Plaintiff, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 5, 2018; and the Plaintiff can be recognized as having the obligation to transfer the ownership of the instant land as KRW 370,000,000 for each of the following reasons:

Defendant C, D, and E asserted that since the achievement group acquired the instant land through consultation, the obligation of ownership transfer registration pursuant to the sales contract between the deceased F and the Defendant B was impossible. However, it is insufficient to recognize this only by the fact-finding inquiry report to the achievement office of this court, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.