logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.07.19 2019고단306
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months and a fine not exceeding 200,000 won.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 29, 201, the Defendant is a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act after having received a summary order of KRW 3 million from the Changwon District Court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's order of KRW 1.5 million on December 16, 201 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

At around 04:30 on December 13, 2018, the Defendant driven an E-5 vehicle while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.163% from a 220-meter radius to the front road of the Diplomatic Association located in the same Gu C from the roads in front of the Diplomatic Association in the same Gu.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaging in driving a vehicle EK5 vehicle.

In order to avoid a vehicle driven in the opposite direction on the front of the building B in the Jinhae-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City at the time and time stated in the above paragraph, the Defendant moved down the said vehicle.

Since there are a large number of vehicles stopped around the time, there are duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as making a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle to live well on the back and right side, and accurately operating the brake and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as described in the foregoing paragraph, was unable to breadly, and was parked in G Poter F, which was the victim F, and was parked in the same place, was shocked with the part of the Defendant’s car driving seat in front of the car driving seat.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant caused damage to the victim’s cargo vehicle by occupational negligence as above, the Defendant immediately stopped the vehicle and did not take necessary measures, such as providing the victim with personal information, and went away from the site as it is, without taking necessary measures, such as providing the victim with personal information.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a actual survey report;

arrow