The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (six months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant was committing a crime, against the wrongness, and the Defendant did not repeat again while disposing of the vehicle used for committing the crime.

However, the defendant has already been punished by a majority due to drinking driving or non-licenseing driving, and in particular, it has a large degree of criticism in that the defendant's driving without the driver's license was done without being aware of the suspension period of imprisonment due to drinking driving.

In full view of the above circumstances and other conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, such as Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court sentenced the lower court to the statutory minimum sentence that has been mitigated, compared to the first instance court, where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing, and where the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015), the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.