Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 19, 2012, around 02:47, the Defendant committed an indecent act by compulsion by force against the victim E (V), who danced in the “D” club located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by drinking up the victim E (V, 28 years old).

2. The Defendant, on the ground that the date and time set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, at the place, the victim E (n, 28 years of age) was cut, and the victim F (n, 28 years of age) was flicked on the victim’s head and left her at one time, and her head and left her head, and her head were flicked on the ground that the victim F (n, she, she was 28 years of age) was flick on the victim’s face, and the victim F (n, she was flicked) was flick on the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness E, F and G’s statutory statement;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, the choice of punishment, and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of violence and the selection of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant asserts that the judgment on the defendant's assertion under Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act of the Detention in the Labor House did not commit an indecent act against the victim E with respect to indecent act by compulsion, and that the victim's physical contact was only made with the victims in the course of resisting the assault with the victims without any reason, and that the above physical contact constitutes self-defense or legitimate act.

First, as to the indecent act of indecent act by compulsion, the victim E consistently stated that the Defendant left her fingers by inserting her fingers from the investigative agency to this court, and the Defendant’s indecent act and the circumstance in which the Defendant was identified as a criminal do not seem to have been distorted, and the victim E does not appear to have any circumstance to make a false statement.