1. The Defendants indicated in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is divided into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 37, 39, 40, 42, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 297 square meters of AG, Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun (hereinafter “the instant forest”) and 22,97 square meters of land, and the portion of the G, 17, and 701 square meters of land (excluding the portion of the instant forest, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 34, 35, 36, 19, 17, and 17, and 36, 29, 301 square meters of the instant forest,

B. (1) On January 5, 1970, AH succeeded to the Deceased on AK, AL, AM and the Defendant L, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, and T, respectively.

On January 8, 1995, AL succeeded to the deceased by Defendant U, V, W, X, and Y.

AM died on December 5, 1995, and the defendant Z, AA, AB, and AC succeeded to the deceased.

AK succeeded to the Deceased on January 25, 1997 by Defendant N,O, P, Q, R, R, and T, and Defendant Z, AA, AB, and AC inherited the Deceased on behalf of the Deceased.

The inheritance ratio of the above inheritors with respect to co-ownership of the forest of this case by the deceased AH is as shown in attached Form 3.

(2) AD, AE, and AF inherited the Deceased on January 7, 2010.

The inheritance ratio of the heir to the co-ownership share of the deceased AI on the forest of this case shall be as shown in attached Form 4.

【Defendant D, K: Each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 8; the result of the measurement and appraisal commission to the chief of the Cheongdo branch office of the Korea Intellectual Property Tribunal in Daegu-do; the purport of the entire pleadings; and the remaining Defendants except Defendant D and K: Confession

2. The above facts of recognition are examined.