1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 11, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for the payment of medical care benefits and temporary disability compensation benefits to the Defendant on the ground that “Around December 17:30, 2016, the Plaintiff suffered from occupational accidents where stairs are lowered to leave after the completion of the work at the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the House B, Young-gu Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the instant accident”); and that “the escape certificate of the conical signboards in the 2-3th century, the escape certificate of the conical signboards in the 3-4th century (including all above; hereinafter “the instant injury”); and that “the instant injury” suffered from the instant injury “the upper injury”).

B. Accordingly, on April 5, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to grant medical care to the Plaintiff on the ground that “it is deemed that it is an occupational accident but it does not have a proximate causal relation with an occupational accident,” on the ground that it is deemed that the instant injury from among the applicant injury injury, the Defendant: (a) rendered a disposition not to grant medical care for the instant injury from among the applicant injury injury (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Eul Nos. 1 and 2 (including additional numbers), the whole purport of the pleading

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the instant accident occurred on December 2, 2016, resulting in the injury to a bridge and a bridge, and that the Plaintiff performed a self-treatment while performing his duties at the time. However, since brusium continued to exist, the instant disposition for which medical care was not granted to the injury and disease of this case was unlawful.

B. (1) The circumstances leading up to the occurrence of an industrial accident were: (a) from November 13, 2016 on the site B, the Plaintiff was in charge of the construction of a door-to-household mold from November 13, 2016; and (b) on December 2, 2016, the Plaintiff was in charge of the construction of a stairs after the completion of the work at around 17:30 on December 2, 2016; and (c) the Plaintiff visited the hospital to the effect that the Plaintiff was “

Although the above accident was not reported to the company, the plaintiff taken photographs of spambry and sponsed by the plaintiff, and January 12, 2017.