1. Of the part concerning Plaintiff A’s claim in the judgment of the court of first instance, the following amount of money ordered to be paid.

1. The grounds for this part of the underlying facts are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition of the following, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary Part] The facts of the first instance judgment are the basis of the judgment.

On September 2014, the Defendant: “(d) laid off 330 mump trucks for the construction of accommodation facilities at H 2179m square meters of forests and fields owned by the Defendant at the end of the end of September, 2014; (1m 20m high; and (b) laid down soil on the stone fence, which is a boundary mark indicating the boundary of the G land, in the course of reclaiming land at a level of 20m high; and (d) made it impossible for the Defendant to recognize the boundary of the land by doing flating it on the stone fence, which is a boundary mark indicating the boundary of the G land; and (e) received a summary order on May 27, 2015, which became final and conclusive as it is, the above summary order was issued as a summary order on the ground of criminal facts, such as “The effect was by removing 25-year-old 27mlue tree and 3mlue trees in the year 23, 200.”

"Evidence 8" is added to "Evidence 8," which is based on the facts of the first instance judgment.

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts finding that the damage liability occurred, the defendant is liable to compensate the damage suffered by the plaintiff A due to the damage of this case.

B. 1) The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant damaged the 3glue tree and 27glue tree, which were planted on the instant land, including the instant glue tree. The Defendant asserted that only 5glue glue glue glue glue glue glue glue glue glue glue glue was damaged.

The fact that the criminal judgment which became final and conclusive on the same factual basis is recognized as a serious evidence, so it is different from that submitted in the civil trial.