logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.09.09 2015고단559
변호사법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for six months, for each of the Parties B and C.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment has become final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 18, 2012, Defendant A appealed from the Busan District Court upon the sentence of two years of suspended execution, fine of ten million won on May 10, 2013; the dismissal of the appeal on August 14, 2013; and the period of suspended execution as of August 18, 2013, after the final judgment became final and conclusive on August 18, 2013; Defendant B appealed from the Busan District Court on December 18, 2012 upon the sentence of two years of suspended execution and fine of five million won on May 10, 2013; the dismissal of the appeal on August 14, 2013; and the period of suspended execution becomes final and conclusive as of December 18, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

A From January 10 to October 30, 2014, from around October 10, 2013 to around October 30, 2014, a debt collection company was operated on the second floor of the H building in Suwon-gu, Busan, with the trade name of “I.” From November 1, 2014 to January 12, 2015, a debt collection company was operated on the third floor of the J building in Suwon-gu, Busan, with the trade name of “K”. Defendant B was an employee of the said “I” and the Defendant C was an employee of the said “I.”

The Defendants purchased a large amount of claim for the price of goods whose rights are unclear due to the completion of extinctive prescription from the hub for the sale and purchase of bonds, applied for an electronic payment order against multiple debtors, and then asserted extinctive prescription or dispute the existence of a claim, the Defendants withdrawn the electronic payment order. Defendant A offered to seize and collect the electronic payment order when the electronic payment order becomes final and conclusive because the debtor did not raise any objection during the period of objection against the electronic payment order, and Defendant A took charge of the affairs such as the purchase of bonds, the application for the payment order, etc., and Defendant B and C shared take charge of the debtor’s computerized management, the issuance of the executory notice, and the collection work against the debtor.

1. The Defendants A, B, and C co-offenders are on the second floor of the H building in Suwon-gu, Busan around February 6, 2013.

arrow