logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.04.26 2016노986
사기등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The lower court’s sentence (ten months of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence) is deemed to be too unhued and unfair.

2. Determination

A. In light of the fact that the Criminal Procedure Act of Korea adopts the trial-oriented principle and the principle of directness exists in the area unique to the deliberation of the first instance regarding the determination of sentencing, and the fact that the appellate court’s ex post facto heart character, etc., it is reasonable to respect the first instance judgment in cases where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance judgment, and the first instance judgment does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015).

However, the above circumstances were already launched in the proceedings of the oral argument by the lower court, and there was no special change in circumstances that could change the sentence of the lower court after the pronouncement of the lower judgment, and the Defendant is in depth against the Defendant, and the Defendant would not influence such a mistake again.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant is making efforts to recover damage by agreement with most victims or recovering damage; (b) the Defendant’s mother is leading the Defendant; (c) the Defendant’s mother wants to take the Defendant’s guidance; (d) there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine imposed on the Defendant; and (e) other various sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and arguments, including the Defendant’s age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and background, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unjustifiable and unreasonable.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is without merit, and thus, pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow