(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.04.11 2012고합665

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.04.11 2012고합665

성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(특수강간)

Text

1. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten years.

An information and communications network for ten years on the accused's information.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Cases 2012, 665, 2012, 1068;

A. The Defendant and the person subject to a request to attach an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) and the J conspiredd the victim, who had been in the Defendant B, to drink a drug containing the “strokem” (hereinafter “strokem”) at the lowest level of stroke (hereinafter “strokem”) with the victim I (hereinafter “strokem”), thereby getting the victim to engage in sexual intercourse.

The Defendants and J, around May 12, 2012, within the content set up under the direction of G, which connects K and K, the Defendants and the J: (a) allowed the victim to drink “strokem”; and (b) the victim was unable to resist because he was unable to resist; (c) Defendant B, by taking the victim into another content, had the victim off the clothes of the victim and had sexual intercourse with the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendants raped the victim in collaboration with J.

In this part of the facts charged, the part that “Defendant A, C, and J had sexual intercourse with the victim” is examined as follows: (a) the judgment on the argument between the Defendant and the defense counsel is examined.

B. Defendant B and A conspired to engage in sexual intercourse with the victim N (V, 27 years of age) by having the victim Defendant B undergo an “stroke-mm” with the “stroke-m”, thereby getting the victim involved in sexual intercourse.

Defendant

B and A around June 8, 2012, around the new wall, at the Dong-gu Office of Dong-gu, Defendant A’s “P” office operated by Defendant A, entitled the victim to alcohol “stroke-mm”, and the victim was unable to resist, and Defendant B went off the victim’s clothes and had sexual intercourse with the victim, and Defendant A had sexual intercourse with the victim.

Accordingly, Defendant B and A jointly raped the victim.

In this part of the facts charged, the part that “Defendant B and A raped the victim in combination with J” is examined as follows.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.11.29 2018고합67

-인천지방법원 2014.01.09 2013고합774

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2019.10.25 2019고합56

-수원지방법원 2014.04.18 2014고합92

-광주고등법원 2013.10.10 2013노219