beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The lower court sentenced two years and six months of imprisonment, considering the following facts: (a) the circumstances favorable to the Defendant and unfavorable to the Defendant; and (b) the basic area (one to four years) of the two types of general frauds (one hundred million won or more, and less than five hundred million won) (one to four years) (the person subject to special sentencing): The result of a multiple crime that does not apply to the sentencing guidelines: A majority of the crimes that have set the sentencing guidelines and the crimes for which no sentencing guidelines have been set are concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act; (c) the crime for which the sentencing guidelines have been set and the crimes for which the sentencing guidelines have been set are set are concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act; (d) the lower limit of the sentencing range of the recommendations for the crimes for which the sentencing guidelines have been set is set).
In full view of the facts constituting the conditions for sentencing in the first instance court, in particular, that the amount of damage caused by the instant fraudulent act exceeds KRW 300 million, that I made I prepare a false statement, that I submitted it to an investigation agency, that the judgment of the lower court exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, and that the judgment of the lower court exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.
There is no circumstance that it is unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below as it is or that the judgment of the court below is unfair.
In addition, even if the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances, and result of the crime, etc. are considered, the sentence of the court below is proper and too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal for conclusion is without merit.