1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 1,625,170 against the defendant and the defendant shall be fully paid from April 15, 2009.

1. The following facts may be acknowledged by taking into account the facts in dispute between the parties, Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 8, Gap evidence No. 14-1, Gap evidence No. 15, Eul evidence Nos. 15, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 5-7-2, Eul evidence No. 11, 13-15-2, Eul’s witness No. 11, 13-15-2, and the whole purport of the testimony and pleading, and there is no counter-proof except for the witness F’s testimony not employed by party members.

The defendant employs 130 full-time workers and engages in the taxi transport business. The plaintiff A shall be the taxi engineer in the contract at the defendant company from December 18, 2005 to the closing of argument in this case, the plaintiff B shall be the taxi engineer in the contract at the defendant company from March 17, 200 to August 16, 2009, the plaintiff C shall be the plaintiff from August 21, 199 to April 14, 2009, and the plaintiff D shall be the regular taxi engineer from March 1, 200 to March 31, 2009.

B. On December 18, 2005, Plaintiff A entered into an employment contract on a contractual basis with the Defendant on December 18, 2005, and the content thereof (hereinafter referred to as Plaintiff A’s employment contract) is as a principle for the period of work from December 18, 2005 to March 18, 2006, working conditions shall be seven hours a day and twenty minutes a day, working conditions may be extended if there is an agreement between the parties, and legal allowances due to overtime work shall be included in the piece rate paid (Article 4), the hours of dispatch shall be from 03:0 p.m. to 13:00 p.m. to 00 p.m. and from 15:00 p.m. to 00 p.m. to 01:0 p.m. (Article 6); transportation revenue shall be paid in full to the Defendant; if the amount paid as performance bonus exceeds the rate of 1,274,000 p.m. or 20% of the performance bonus system, it shall be paid.

However, the defendant.