1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 112,79,116 with respect to the Plaintiff, and the period from February 27, 2018 to March 31, 2020.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) was awarded a contract with the Korea Electric Power Corporation for the replacement of electric wires near Duyang-gun D, and Defendant C is the head of the Defendant B’s site.

On February 27, 2018, at around 10:10, Defendant B’s name misexplored the electric wires while working to replace the electric wires operated by the Plaintiff in Sayang-gun D, and caused the Plaintiff’s head at the E industry E industry E industry E (hereinafter “instant accident”) due to the decline of the said electric wires, thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff’s chronic damage.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6 and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the Defendants jointly and severally are liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. There is no dispute over the fact that the loss equivalent to the lost income suffered by the Plaintiff was KRW 84,929,626.

B. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff spent the medical expenses incurred from the instant accident while hospitalized in the F Hospital, G Hospital, and H Hospital. The Defendants asserted that there was no causal link with the instant accident among the above medical expenses, the higher-class hospital usage fees, the special meals, and the guardian awareness.

(1) The F Hospital’s treatment costs are KRW 23,343,186; KRW 4,620,00 for the higher-class hospital room service charges; KRW 5,274,760 for the special food; KRW 5,274,760 for the G Hospital’s treatment costs; KRW 270,00 for the higher-class hospital service charges; KRW 22,117,920 for the H Hospital’s treatment costs; KRW 15,220,00 for the higher-class hospital service charges; KRW 270 for the care room; and KRW 22,117,920 for the first-class hospital service charges.

[Reasons for Recognition] A, Gap evidence Nos. 11, 12, 15, and 16 (including a branch number if there are a branch number), and the victim of tort was hospitalized in a higher-class hospital instead of being hospitalized in a general hospital.