logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.05.04 2017고단3296
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for one year and four months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records】

1. On March 29, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on June 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 6, 2013. On May 12, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for an occupational embezzlement, etc. at the Suwon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 20, 2016.

2. On October 31, 2012, Defendant B was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Chuncheon District Court on August 31, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 8, 2012. On March 29, 2013, the Seoul East District Court was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. on July 2, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 26, 2013 upon being sentenced to a one-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Chuncheon District Court on April 18, 2013, and on May 1, 2013, the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 4, 2013.

【Defendant A is the representative of “E” as a distributor, and Defendant B is the person who was working as a director in charge of the business of the above company.

The Defendants, as well as not only did the victim F have the ability to sell food points in a lot, but also had the possibility of securing the right to operate a lot soft, they had the victim F with the intent to receive money from the victim under the pretext of rebates and entertainment expenses, etc., by deceiving the victim F as if he could definitely have the windowped points in a lot, even though they could not be able to secure the right to operate a lot soft.

Accordingly, Defendant A does not normally make profits to the victim at the mutual infinite coffee shop located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul around the beginning of June 2012.

First of all, it is false to the purport that it is necessary to pay as expenses to persons engaged in a lot, and Defendant B took the victim into a lot around July 2012.

The contract was made with a person with a lot-related relationship, such as waiting for a flag room.

arrow